N.B. — I've been dreading the thought of publishing this post. It's been sitting here in draft mode for a very long time. I know I'll stir up some kind of tempest, and there's probably not a single comment in reply that I'm not expecting. There's something here for everyone to dislike.
I'm an avid reader of the Internet. Thanks to the Internet, I'm exposed to ideas and opinions that I never would have believed possible. Some have angered me, others have enlightened me. The best of them have managed to amuse me while enlightening me. In large part because of the things I learned on the Internet and through email, I became Catholic, for which I will reap the benefits in eternity.
But nowhere on the Internet do I find my unique set of opinions, especially my political opinions.
Everywhere I look, I find one of two things: conservative writings that are smug, smarmy, and dishonest, full of hatred and easily disprovable lies or errors; or liberal writings that include, not just atheistic, but anti-religious screeds and fist-pounding in favor of abortion. Libertarians as expressed online are no better, because they can be just as godless, worshipping the god of free-market and personal choice without attention to spirituality or responsibility to one's fellow man.
Depending on the topic at hand, I have been accused of being both conservative and liberal, and come away feeling insulted either way.
Here are some of my thoughts for which people have called me "liberal":
I am very pro-union. I'm under no illusions that unions are perfect, but they are an absolute necessity to counter the wealth-driven corporate steamroller that mashes workers flat all in the name of capitalism. I have seen the face of corporate greed firsthand, and there is zero concern about how any behavior by the corporation might affect the employees. And as His Holiness John Paul II (who was himself a fan of unions) pointed out, "The thing that must shape the whole economy is respect for the workers’ rights."
I am an environmentalist. God appointed us as stewards of this planet. While I'm no scientist and can't prove or disprove the whole "global warming" thing any better than the average man on the street, I also have a hard time believing that spewing excessive carbon dioxide and other pollutants in the air and water could possibly be a good thing. Each individual and corporation has the responsibility to take care of the resources we have, because we will all be held accountable by God one day.
I am a big fan of separation of church and state. Once you blur the line between government and Church, you compromise the integrity of not just the state, but the Church as well. The Church already prohibits clergy from serving in a political capacity. Likewise, the US Constitution prohibits the official establishment of religion or the sponsorship thereof. Christ Himself said to render unto Caesar that which was Caesar's, and to God that which was God's, clearly drawing the line that the two were separate entities. Government must attend to worldly affairs in the here and now, and the Church must attend to the spiritual matters which lead to the hereafter.
Here are some of my thoughts for which people have called me "conservative":
I am completely against abortion, for what I feel are obvious reasons. It's infanticide, duh! Even though it was never brought up in our house, I'm sure I could have figured out at a very early age that baby-killing was a bad thing. To me this is a no-brainer, and I still haven't figured out what contortions the Supreme Court had to go through to not only say it wasn't, but that it is a Constitutionally protected right — go figure.
I am a Christian. Yes, despite the openly derisive things that are said about how "stupid" and "intellectually backward" I must be, or that my being a Christian is just a result of my living in the Backwater Deep South™ (which is code for "stupid redneck"), I insist on being identified as a Christian. Everything I say automatically gets twenty IQ points knocked off in people's minds because of it.
And here's at least one thought that defies a label:
I am opposed to the state recognizing gay marriage. I see the phrase "gay marriage" as an oxymoron. Of course, I'm not in favor of the state recognizing "straight" marriage, either. I believe it invests the state with too much power over a sacramental relationship. It's a religious vocation not unlike the priesthood in its own way, and it's ludicrous to think that one must obtain a license to exercise a religious vocation, especially in the same office where you apply for your fishing license.
My suggestion: Since it seems that what the real battle is about, is having an equal say in deciding who gets insurance benefits and rights of survivorship and other inheritance matters, let's abolish the marriage license altogether, and create a civil partnership license, which formalizes all those technical details. This is the sort of thing at which the state excels.
The good news is, there would be no more muddying the waters of the definition of marriage. The Church would once again be able to assert her authority over its meaning. Matter of fact, this is a shining example of what I said before about separation of church and state. The state has stuck its nose in religious business (marriage) for far too long, and the result has been the cheapening of the institution.
See what I mean? Something for everyone to dislike!
Then again, maybe I reflect the views of a lot of people who just don't hang out on the Internet like I do. If that's the case, and you've just been looking for someone who thinks like you do, talk to me! I'd love to hear from you. If not, well, I kind of expected that, too.
I'm an avid reader of the Internet. Thanks to the Internet, I'm exposed to ideas and opinions that I never would have believed possible. Some have angered me, others have enlightened me. The best of them have managed to amuse me while enlightening me. In large part because of the things I learned on the Internet and through email, I became Catholic, for which I will reap the benefits in eternity.
But nowhere on the Internet do I find my unique set of opinions, especially my political opinions.
Everywhere I look, I find one of two things: conservative writings that are smug, smarmy, and dishonest, full of hatred and easily disprovable lies or errors; or liberal writings that include, not just atheistic, but anti-religious screeds and fist-pounding in favor of abortion. Libertarians as expressed online are no better, because they can be just as godless, worshipping the god of free-market and personal choice without attention to spirituality or responsibility to one's fellow man.
Depending on the topic at hand, I have been accused of being both conservative and liberal, and come away feeling insulted either way.
Here are some of my thoughts for which people have called me "liberal":
I am very pro-union. I'm under no illusions that unions are perfect, but they are an absolute necessity to counter the wealth-driven corporate steamroller that mashes workers flat all in the name of capitalism. I have seen the face of corporate greed firsthand, and there is zero concern about how any behavior by the corporation might affect the employees. And as His Holiness John Paul II (who was himself a fan of unions) pointed out, "The thing that must shape the whole economy is respect for the workers’ rights."
I am an environmentalist. God appointed us as stewards of this planet. While I'm no scientist and can't prove or disprove the whole "global warming" thing any better than the average man on the street, I also have a hard time believing that spewing excessive carbon dioxide and other pollutants in the air and water could possibly be a good thing. Each individual and corporation has the responsibility to take care of the resources we have, because we will all be held accountable by God one day.
I am a big fan of separation of church and state. Once you blur the line between government and Church, you compromise the integrity of not just the state, but the Church as well. The Church already prohibits clergy from serving in a political capacity. Likewise, the US Constitution prohibits the official establishment of religion or the sponsorship thereof. Christ Himself said to render unto Caesar that which was Caesar's, and to God that which was God's, clearly drawing the line that the two were separate entities. Government must attend to worldly affairs in the here and now, and the Church must attend to the spiritual matters which lead to the hereafter.
Here are some of my thoughts for which people have called me "conservative":
I am completely against abortion, for what I feel are obvious reasons. It's infanticide, duh! Even though it was never brought up in our house, I'm sure I could have figured out at a very early age that baby-killing was a bad thing. To me this is a no-brainer, and I still haven't figured out what contortions the Supreme Court had to go through to not only say it wasn't, but that it is a Constitutionally protected right — go figure.
I am a Christian. Yes, despite the openly derisive things that are said about how "stupid" and "intellectually backward" I must be, or that my being a Christian is just a result of my living in the Backwater Deep South™ (which is code for "stupid redneck"), I insist on being identified as a Christian. Everything I say automatically gets twenty IQ points knocked off in people's minds because of it.
And here's at least one thought that defies a label:
I am opposed to the state recognizing gay marriage. I see the phrase "gay marriage" as an oxymoron. Of course, I'm not in favor of the state recognizing "straight" marriage, either. I believe it invests the state with too much power over a sacramental relationship. It's a religious vocation not unlike the priesthood in its own way, and it's ludicrous to think that one must obtain a license to exercise a religious vocation, especially in the same office where you apply for your fishing license.
My suggestion: Since it seems that what the real battle is about, is having an equal say in deciding who gets insurance benefits and rights of survivorship and other inheritance matters, let's abolish the marriage license altogether, and create a civil partnership license, which formalizes all those technical details. This is the sort of thing at which the state excels.
The good news is, there would be no more muddying the waters of the definition of marriage. The Church would once again be able to assert her authority over its meaning. Matter of fact, this is a shining example of what I said before about separation of church and state. The state has stuck its nose in religious business (marriage) for far too long, and the result has been the cheapening of the institution.
See what I mean? Something for everyone to dislike!
Then again, maybe I reflect the views of a lot of people who just don't hang out on the Internet like I do. If that's the case, and you've just been looking for someone who thinks like you do, talk to me! I'd love to hear from you. If not, well, I kind of expected that, too.
|